Unofficial guide · not affiliated with NCSBN, Pearson VUE, AACN, or CCNE Tutorials · Exam Admin
E Exam Admin
SI Nursing · tutorials

Tutorial 2 of 3 · ~15 minutes

NGN item-type walkthroughs

Since April 1, 2023, the NCLEX has included Next Generation (NGN) item types built around NCSBN's Clinical Judgment Measurement Model: bow-tie, trend, cloze, matrix, highlight, and extended multiple response. Clinical-judgment items appear both as three six-item unfolding case studies and as stand-alone items — about ten percent of the exam — that can draw on any content category. NGN items use partial-credit scoring: a blank earns nothing, but a partial answer still earns partial credit. (NCSBN, 2026 NCLEX-RN Test Plan; NCSBN NGN resources.)

Below: the four types students ask about most, each with an original worked example. Every example is written for teaching and is not a real NCLEX item.

1. Bow-tie

What it is: an extended drag-and-drop item shaped like a bow-tie. From a clinical scenario you select one condition the client is most likely experiencing, two actions the nurse should take, and two parameters the nurse should monitor. The five selections must tell one coherent clinical story — the condition you pick has to justify the actions and the monitoring.

The approach:

  1. Read the cues first, name the condition. Cluster the vital signs, labs, and presentation into a pattern before you touch the options. The condition is the anchor — everything else hangs off it.
  2. Pick actions that treat that condition. Ask of each candidate action: "Would I do this for the condition I just named?" If it treats a different problem, it doesn't belong.
  3. Pick parameters that would tell you the condition is improving or worsening. Monitoring choices should track the condition itself or the risks of your chosen actions.
  4. Re-read the bow-tie as a sentence: "The client most likely has ___, so I will ___ and ___, while watching ___ and ___." If the sentence doesn't make clinical sense, something is wrong.
Example for teaching — not a real NCLEX item

Scenario. A 68-year-old client is admitted with pneumonia. This morning: temperature 101.8°F (38.8°C), heart rate 112, respiratory rate 26, blood pressure 96/58, SpO2 90% on room air. The client is restless and confused to place. Urine output 25 mL/hr for the last 2 hours. Lactate 3.4 mmol/L.

Question. Complete the diagram: the condition the client is most likely experiencing, two actions the nurse should take, and two parameters the nurse should monitor.

Options. Condition: sepsis / dehydration / asthma exacerbation · Actions: obtain blood cultures before antibiotics / encourage oral fluids only / administer prescribed broad-spectrum antibiotics / place the client in high Fowler's position and reassure · Monitor: blood pressure and urine output / peak flow readings / skin turgor only / mental status and lactate

Worked answer. The cues cluster into sepsis: infection source (pneumonia) + fever + tachycardia + tachypnea + hypotension + altered mental status + low urine output + elevated lactate. Actions: obtain blood cultures before antibiotics and administer prescribed broad-spectrum antibiotics — early cultures and early antibiotics are the sepsis priorities. Monitor: blood pressure and urine output and mental status and lactate — perfusion markers that show whether the client is responding. The sentence reads clean: "The client most likely has sepsis, so I will get cultures and start antibiotics, while watching perfusion and lactate."

Common trap: the incoherent bow-tie. The most frequent miss is picking the right condition but actions for a different condition — usually the action you'd take for the most dramatic single cue rather than the whole picture. Always run the sentence test in step 4. Our read: if two of your five selections don't fit the sentence, you probably misnamed the condition in step 1 — go back there, not to the options.

2. Trend

What it is: six items built on one unfolding case. You get values across time points — vital signs, labs, intake/output — and the items ask what changed, what it means, and what to do next. The skill being tested is reading change over time, not interpreting a single snapshot.

The approach:

  1. Scan every time point before answering anything. Note the direction of each trend: improving, worsening, or stable. Mark the values that crossed into abnormal.
  2. Link the trends to the story. A falling hemoglobin after surgery means something different from a falling hemoglobin on admission. The case narrative tells you which.
  3. Answer "what changed" before "what to do." Trend items follow NCSBN's clinical-judgment sequence — recognize cues, then analyze, then act. Jumping to interventions before naming the change is where most points are lost.
  4. Watch for the turnaround. Later time points sometimes show improvement after an intervention — the item may be testing whether you recognize the treatment is working, not whether you escalate.
Example for teaching — not a real NCLEX item

Case excerpt. A 54-year-old client is admitted for heart failure exacerbation and started on IV furosemide.

Time points. Day 1: K+ 4.1 mEq/L, weight 82 kg, lung sounds with crackles at bases, reports mild dyspnea. Day 2: K+ 3.6 mEq/L, weight 80.4 kg, crackles clearing, dyspnea improved. Day 3: K+ 3.1 mEq/L, weight 79.1 kg, lungs clear, reports muscle cramps and weakness.

Question. Which finding requires the nurse's priority follow-up on Day 3?

Worked answer. Two trends are running at once: the heart-failure picture is improving (weight down, lungs clearing, dyspnea better — the furosemide is working), while potassium is falling (4.1 → 3.6 → 3.1) with new muscle cramps and weakness — classic hypokalemia cues. The turnaround trap is the improving lungs; the priority is the potassium of 3.1 mEq/L with muscle cramps, which needs provider notification and likely potassium replacement before the next diuretic dose. Read the trend, not the snapshot.

Common trap: anchoring on the first time point. Students lock onto the admission values and miss that the clinical picture has moved on. Force yourself to describe each value's direction before choosing. Our read: on trend items, the correct answer is very often the thing that changed most recently, not the thing that was worst at admission.

3. Cloze (drop-down)

What it is: prose sentences or tables with embedded drop-down menus. You choose the best option for each blank — and each drop-down is scored separately, so every blank is its own opportunity for partial credit.

The approach:

  1. Read the whole sentence first, blanks and all. The surrounding context usually constrains what each blank can be.
  2. Answer each blank independently. Don't let your choice in blank 1 talk you into a matching-but-wrong choice in blank 2. Each drop-down is scored on its own.
  3. Never leave a blank empty. A blank earns nothing; your best guess earns a chance at partial credit.
  4. Check units and direction words. Cloze options love near-miss pairs (hypo/hyper, increase/decrease). Read the blank's neighbors twice.
Example for teaching — not a real NCLEX item

Item. A client with chronic kidney disease has a serum potassium of 6.1 mEq/L. The nurse anticipates the provider will prescribe sodium polystyrene sulfonate / potassium chloride / spironolactone and will monitor the client's cardiac rhythm / bowel sounds only / capillary refill only most closely.

Worked answer. Blank 1: sodium polystyrene sulfonate — a potassium-lowering agent; potassium chloride and spironolactone would raise potassium further. Blank 2: cardiac rhythm — hyperkalemia's lethal risk is cardiac dysrhythmia, so rhythm monitoring outranks the other choices. Each blank stands alone: even if you missed the drug, the rhythm answer is still earnable.

Common trap: the cascade error. Students get blank 1 wrong and then pick blank 2 to "match" their wrong blank 1, turning one miss into two. Treat every drop-down as a fresh question. Our read: cloze items reward careful readers more than deep memorizers — slow down on these even in a timed block.

4. Select all that apply (SATA)

What it is: extended multiple response — more than five options possible. NGN scoring gives partial credit, so every option you confidently select counts, and a blank earns nothing. There is no penalty for a wrong selection beyond missing that portion of the credit — but random guessing still dilutes a good answer.

The approach:

  1. Cover the options; answer from the stem first. Ask yourself what you expect the answer set to contain before you read a single option. This defeats distractor pull.
  2. Judge every option as its own true/false question. Never pick options by comparison ("this one looks better than that one"). Each option is independently correct or not.
  3. Select everything you are confident about; leave what you genuinely don't know. Partial credit rewards confident selections. Don't leave the item blank, and don't talk yourself into options you can't defend.
  4. Watch for the "one of these is not like the others" pattern. If four options describe one condition and one describes its opposite, that one is usually out — but verify each on its own merits.
Example for teaching — not a real NCLEX item

Item. A client has a serum potassium of 2.9 mEq/L. Which findings are consistent with hypokalemia? Select all that apply.

Options. A. Muscle cramps and weakness · B. Peaked T waves on ECG · C. Flattened T waves with prominent U waves · D. Constipation · E. Hyperactive bowel sounds · F. Postural hypotension

Worked answer. A, C, D, F. Hypokalemia: muscle weakness/cramps (A), flattened T waves with U waves (C), decreased GI motility causing constipation (D), and postural hypotension (F). B is out — peaked T waves signal hyperkalemia, the classic opposite-trap. E is out — bowel sounds are diminished, not hyperactive, in hypokalemia. Judged one by one, the set assembles itself.

Common trap: the "pick two and stop" habit. Students trained on single-best-answer items select the two most obvious options and move on, leaving confident third and fourth picks unselected — and partial credit on the table. Our read: on SATA, the question to ask is never "which two?" but "which of these am I sure about?" — then select all of those.

Also on the exam: matrix and highlight

  • Matrix / grid: rows of options, each judged (for example indicated/contraindicated or yes/no). Like cloze, every row is a scoring opportunity — answer them all.
  • Enhanced hot spot / highlight: click to highlight the relevant words in a passage or cells in a table. The discipline is the same as bow-tie step 1: name the pattern before you click.

All NGN formats share one rule from NCSBN's scoring: answer every row, drop-down, and blank — a blank earns nothing, and a partial answer still earns partial credit.

Practice the mechanics. Walk each format once untimed, then drill them inside timed blocks in Take an exam. When a format keeps tripping you, paste the item to Nick (Ask Nick button, below) and ask him to walk you through it step by step.

← How to study Next: Test-taking strategies →